The global growth rate of the healthcare sector has consistently outpaced global GDP growth
Broadly diversified healthcare all-rounder with a focus on mega and large caps, complemented by small and mid caps
Active approach with a focus on structural growth and disciplined monitoring of portfolio metrics
Indexed performance (as at: 13.06.2025)
NAV: CHF 108.77 (12.06.2025)
Rolling performance (13.06.2025)
I-CHF | Benchmark | |
12.06.2024 - 12.06.2025 | -14.37% | -12.39% |
12.06.2023 - 12.06.2024 | 10.88% | 9.91% |
10.06.2022 - 12.06.2023 | -2.70% | -1.13% |
Annualized performance (13.06.2025)
I-CHF | Benchmark | |
1 year | -14.37% | -12.39% |
3 years | -2.61% | -1.63% |
Since Inception p.a. | -4.25% | -2.25% |
Cumulative performance (13.06.2025)
I-CHF | Benchmark | |
1M | -0.35% | -0.89% |
YTD | -8.33% | -8.04% |
1 year | -14.37% | -12.39% |
3 years | -7.62% | -4.80% |
Since Inception | -12.98% | -7.03% |
Annual performance
I-CHF | Benchmark | |
2024 | 10.34% | 9.40% |
2023 | -8.39% | -5.55% |
Facts & Key figures
Investment Focus
The Bellevue Diversified Healthcare fund aims to achieve long-term capital growth, is actively managed and invests worldwide in companies with innovative business models that are active in all subsectors of the healthcare sector, such as biotechnology, medical technology, generics, pharma and healthcare services, Show moreShow less
Investment suitability & Risk
Low risk
High risk
General Information
Investment Manager | Bellevue Asset Management AG |
Custodian | CACEIS BANK, LUXEMBOURG BRANCH |
Fund Administrator | CACEIS BANK, LUXEMBOURG BRANCH |
Auditor | PriceWaterhouseCoopers |
Launch date | 31.03.2022 |
Year end closing | 30. Jun |
NAV Calculation | Daily "Forward Pricing" |
Cut of time | 15:00 CET |
Management Fee | 0.90% |
Subscription Fee (max.) | 5.00% |
ISIN number | LU2441706848 |
Valor number | 116533047 |
Bloomberg | BDHCICH LX |
WKN | A3DEAP |
Legal Information
Legal form | Luxembourg UCITS V SICAV |
SFDR category | Article 8 |
Key data (31.05.2025, base currency USD)
Beta | 0.93 |
Volatility | 12.43 |
Tracking error | 3.79 |
Active share | 26.81 |
Correlation | 0.95 |
Sharpe ratio | -0.31 |
Information ratio | -0.46 |
Jensen's alpha | -1.92 |
No. of positions | 65 |
Portfolio
Top 10 positions
Market capitalization
Geographic breakdown
Breakdown by sector
Benefits & Risks
Benefits
- Profit from the worldwide growth of the healthcare sector, which has clearly outpaced the growth of global GDP during the past ten years.
- Take advantage of the positive characteristics of the healthcare sector and generate alpha through a bottom-up selection process and factor allocation strategies.
- Strategic overweighting of the “structural growth” factor and underweighting of blue-chip pharmaceutical stocks.
- Low earnings risk – above-average earnings growth, even in crisis years, leading to stable portfolio components.
- Bellevue – healthcare pioneer since 1993 and today one of the biggest independent investors in the sector in Europe.
Risks
- The fund actively invests in equities. Equities are subject to strong price fluctuations and so are also exposed to the risk of price losses.
- The fund may invest a proportion of its assets in financial instruments that might under certain circumstances have a relatively low level of liquidity, which can in turn affect the fund’s liquidity.
- The fund invests in foreign currencies, which means a corresponding degree of currency risk against the reference currency.
- Investing in emerging markets entails the additional risk of political and social instability.
- The fund may engage in derivatives transactions. The increased opportunities gained come with an increased risk of losses.
Review / Outlook
US President Trump released an Executive Order (EO) calling for most-favored-nation (MFN) drug pricing on May 12. This added considerable uncertainty regarding future US drug pricing. HHS has 30 days (from May 12) to propose drug price targets, with the industry being given 180 days to show signs of progress. There is an expectation in the market that CMS will announce the start of a pilot program around MFN. This would involve a consulting period, which would be an opportunity for the industry to respond. While the EO stated all branded drugs, it is likely that this will need to be narrowed to specific government channels, especially in the context of a pilot study. Should the scope narrow, we could see a clearing event for biopharma.
Alongside this, there remains the 232 investigation on pharmaceuticals related to national security and potential tariffs. Should this be narrowed to drugs produced exclusively in China which do actually hold a national security risk (antibiotics and Ibuprofen, for example) in the coming months, we could see this also acting as a clearing event for the biopharma. It is possible that the US biopharma industry will volunteer to leave manufacturing capacity spare to fill any gap in supply should China tensions raise.
In this backdrop of healthcare policy uncertainty, the month ended with two unwelcome high-profile idiosyncratic setbacks (Regeneron/Sanofi IL33 mixed results; Summit/Akeso VEGF/PDL bispecific OS miss, described below) adding to the negative sentiment around biopharma stock risk/reward.
The conference season kicked off in May, with the team attending the Bank Of America conference in Las Vegas, where the large-cap US medtech players such as Boston Scientific and Stryker gave encouraging commentary around current trends and utilization. Late in the month, we attended the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) annual meeting. This is the largest medical conference on the calendar. We were on the ground talking to doctors about new innovation in cancer treatment. During the meeting we gained a growing picture of the potential new modalities and mechanisms that are emerging in early/mid-stage studies (ADCs, bispecifics, etc.).
Within the portfolio, there were strong contributions from a mixture of mid to large-sized companies which had reported strong Q1 earnings results (Insulet, Pro Medicus, Veeva, Sandoz, Galderma, Haleon).
We remain focused on high-conviction names from a bottom-up perspective, and see a broad exposure to subsectors, style and geography as appropriate from an risk perspective.
Documents
Show moreShow less